top of page

Private Credit and Secondaries in Wealth Portfolios: Why Access Is Only the Starting Point

  • Writer: Tania  Tugonon
    Tania Tugonon
  • Jun 10
  • 7 min read

Key Takeaways

  • Private wealth is becoming one of the largest growth channels for private markets.¹

  • Private credit is emerging as a primary entry point for RIAs seeking income, and diversification.²

  • Private market secondaries offer access to seasoned assets but require specialized due diligence.³

  • Liquidity terms, underwriting quality, manager selection, and portfolio construction remain critical considerations.

  • RIAs will play a significant role in determining how responsibly private market investments are incorporated into client portfolios.


How Private Wealth Is Reshaping Private Markets

For most of the last three decades, private markets were largely reserved for institutional investors. Pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, and large family offices drove capital formation across private equity, private credit, infrastructure, and real assets.


Today, private wealth is becoming one of the fastest-growing distribution channels for private markets. Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs), family offices, and high-net-worth investors are gaining access to private credit funds, private equity secondaries, and other alternative investments that were previously available primarily to institutional investors.¹


Large asset managers are responding with evergreen funds, semi-liquid structures, interval funds, and wealth-oriented investment vehicles designed specifically for the wealth management market.¹


The momentum behind private wealth adoption is becoming increasingly visible. A 2026 survey commissioned by Hamilton Lane found that 97% of financial advisors already allocate a portion of client portfolios to private markets, while 86% expect to increase those allocations this year.⁴ The survey highlights how quickly private markets are becoming integrated into wealth management portfolios.


The conversation is no longer about whether private markets are becoming more accessible.


The more important question is whether access is being matched with the appropriate diligence, investor education, liquidity expectations, and risk management framework.


Recent scrutiny around private credit redemption limits and liquidity management highlights why this distinction matters. Private credit is not facing a single crisis as much as it is facing a credibility test in the wealth channel.


Access Is Not the Same as Suitability

The expansion of private market access does not eliminate the complexity of private market investing.


Private investments differ materially from traditional public market exposures. Valuation methodologies are different. Liquidity is constrained. Redemption structures vary significantly. Reporting standards differ across managers. Manager selection has a greater influence on outcomes than many investors realize.


As private wealth allocations to alternative investments continue to increase, advisors face a challenge institutional investors have long managed: distinguishing between accessibility and suitability.


Access alone does not improve portfolio outcomes. Disciplined implementation does.


Why Private Credit Has Become an Important Alternative Investment for RIAs

Private credit's growth in wealth management has been driven by several years of strong fundraising, attractive income profiles, and demand for alternatives to traditional fixed income.


The current environment is now reminding investors that liquidity structure, valuation practices, and borrower quality matter just as much as yield.


Among alternative investments, private credit has become a primary entry point for many RIAs evaluating private markets.


Several characteristics have contributed to growing advisor interest:

  • Income-oriented return profiles

  • Floating-rate exposure in higher-rate environments

  • Senior secured lending structures

  • Asset-backed finance opportunities

  • Diversification beyond traditional fixed income markets

  • Reduced correlation to public market volatility


Private credit has grown from a niche institutional allocation into one of the largest segments of the alternative investment landscape. Recent industry estimates place global private credit assets near $2 trillion, reflecting the continued migration of lending activity from traditional banks to private capital providers.²


For wealth managers seeking income-generating investments, private credit offers compelling attributes. However, manager quality remains a critical differentiator.

Underwriting discipline, sector expertise, portfolio diversification, covenant protections, and downside risk management often determine long-term performance far more than headline yield.


Not all private credit strategies carry the same risk profile.


The Current Climate: Private Credit’s Wealth Channel Stress Test

The growth of private credit in the wealth channel is occurring at the same time the asset class is facing one of its most important tests since entering mainstream advisor portfolios. This scrutiny is less about whether private credit belongs in wealth portfolios and more about how advisors evaluate liquidity, structure, and investor expectations.


Recent redemption pressure across several wealth-oriented private credit vehicles has highlighted an important distinction: semi-liquid does not mean fully liquid. Many evergreen funds, interval funds, tender-offer funds, and non-traded BDCs provide periodic liquidity, but that liquidity is typically subject to caps, gates, board discretion, available cash, portfolio cash flows, and fund-level liquidity management.


For RIAs, this is not simply a product structure issue. It is a client communication issue.


Private credit may still offer income, diversification, floating-rate exposure, and access to lending opportunities outside the public markets. However, the current environment is reminding advisors that yield and access cannot be evaluated separately from liquidity, valuation policy, borrower quality, sector exposure, and downside protection.

This does not mean private credit is unsuitable for wealth portfolios. It means the diligence standard needs to rise as adoption increases.


Advisors should be asking more specific questions: What happens if redemption requests exceed available liquidity? How are loans valued? What sectors or borrower types create the greatest stress exposure? How much of the portfolio is directly originated versus fund exposure? What liquidity sources support repurchases? How has the manager handled prior periods of volatility?


The current noise around private credit may ultimately be healthy if it pushes the wealth channel toward better education, clearer expectations, and more institutional-quality diligence.


How Private Market Secondaries Fit Into Wealth Portfolios

As private wealth participation expands and liquidity becomes a larger focus across private markets, secondaries are attracting increasing attention.


In a market where liquidity is becoming more valuable, secondaries are moving from a niche allocation to a practical portfolio management tool.


The same forces driving greater attention toward liquidity in private credit are also increasing interest in secondaries.


Advisors, GPs, and LPs are all looking more closely at portfolio rebalancing, mature fund exposure, and liquidity planning.


At the same time, GPs are increasingly using continuation vehicles and other liquidity solutions to manage asset hold periods and provide optionality to investors.


Unlike primary commitments to blind-pool funds, secondaries provide access to existing private market assets and portfolios. Investors gain visibility into underlying holdings and, in some cases, access to more seasoned assets with shorter remaining duration profiles.³


Secondaries can also provide opportunities to acquire exposure at discounts to reported net asset value.


However, discounts should not be viewed as value creation on their own. They can reflect genuine opportunity, but they can also reflect weaker assets, stale valuations, duration risk, or limited buyer demand.


Advisors should evaluate:

  • The quality of underlying assets

  • Discount-to-value dynamics

  • Manager concentration exposure

  • Portfolio diversification

  • Remaining duration and cash flow profile

  • Liquidity timing assumptions


A discount alone does not create value. The quality of the underlying assets ultimately determines investment outcomes.


A Due Diligence Framework for RIAs Evaluating Private Credit and Secondaries

As private markets become a larger component of wealth management portfolios, due diligence becomes increasingly important.


The current environment is reinforcing a simple lesson: structure, liquidity, manager selection, and client suitability matter as much as headline yield or performance.


The most effective advisors approach private market investing with a framework similar to institutional allocators.


1. Manager Track Record and Underwriting Discipline

Historical performance matters, but understanding how returns were generated matters more.


Advisors should evaluate sourcing capabilities, underwriting standards, realized losses, workout experience, and performance across multiple market cycles.


2. Portfolio Construction and Concentration Risk

Diversification should be evaluated at the borrower, issuer, industry, and sector level.

Concentrated portfolios can create significantly different risk exposures than investors expect.


3. Collateral, Covenants, and Downside Protection

Private credit structures deserve detailed analysis.

Seniority, collateral coverage, covenant packages, recovery history, and downside protection mechanisms become increasingly important during periods of market stress.


4. Liquidity Terms and Redemption Mechanics

One of the most common challenges in private market investing is the mismatch between investor expectations and actual liquidity provisions.


Redemption gates, lockups, tender mechanisms, liquidity reserves, and fund-level liquidity management policies should be thoroughly understood before capital is committed.⁵


5. Reporting Transparency

Investors should have access to meaningful portfolio-level reporting, performance attribution, risk metrics, and exposure data.


Transparency supports better decision-making and more effective client communication.


6. Fees and Alignment

Fee structures should be evaluated alongside expected net returns.

Manager co-investment and alignment of interests remain important indicators of long-term partnership quality.


7. Client Suitability and Education

Perhaps most importantly, advisors must ensure clients understand what they own, why they own it, and the tradeoffs involved.


Private market investments should be positioned as long-term allocations within a broader portfolio construction framework rather than short-term performance solutions.


The Future of Private Markets in Wealth Management

Private wealth is clearly influencing the evolution of private markets.


Product structures are changing. Distribution channels are expanding. Asset managers are increasingly designing private credit funds, secondaries strategies, and alternative investment solutions specifically for wealth management platforms.


Yet the long-term success of this evolution will not be determined by product availability alone.


The current discussion around redemption pressure, liquidity limits, valuation practices, and investor expectations is a reminder that access and suitability are not the same thing.


Private credit continues to offer compelling opportunities for income generation and diversification. Secondaries continue to provide valuable tools for liquidity management and portfolio construction. Neither should be evaluated through a single market cycle or headline.


Private wealth is changing private markets. The advisors who apply institutional-quality diligence, set realistic liquidity expectations, and educate clients on both the opportunities and tradeoffs will play a central role in determining whether that evolution strengthens the private markets ecosystem or simply expands access to it.


Sources:


Disclosures & Disclaimers

This blog post is provided by Axis Group Ventures for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice, and should not be relied upon as such. Nothing contained here should be interpreted as an offer to buy or sell any securities. Any actual offer or solicitation will be made exclusively through formal documentation provided by the relevant issuer or seller.


Axis Group Ventures is not a registered broker-dealer and does not execute, negotiate, or recommend the purchase or sale of securities. Any introductions or private-market support provided by Axis Group Ventures are conducted strictly in an advisory and consulting capacity. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.


Investments in private securities involve significant risks, including the potential loss of the entire investment, and are typically illiquid. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Comments


bottom of page